How seriously does the Kenyan Government take preventive health Care?
By Chrispory Juma Ombuya
When Isiolo’s residents were on record to be recycling used condoms or using polythene bags, it became a national shame as to how our health care system has failed. It became a question of teaching the people the necessity of milk but not giving the cups with which to drink it. The public health implications of this action aside, we lay bare our inability to establish preventive health care for our people.
The general public may have been surprised. But personally as a Public Health student, the reality of how the government has preferred curative health care to preventive health care re-affirmed itself to me. If a government can’t provide condoms for just nearly 20 million sexually active Kenyans, how able is it to provide facilities that can provide treatment against diseases that result from unprotected sex if prevention is really cheaper that cure?
Preventive health care includes measures taken to prevent diseases rather than curing them or treating their symptoms. Preventive health care measures include hygiene and sanitation, immunization, chemoprophylaxis, disease surveillance, screening, safe sex, nutrition and health promotion. It is also called Public Health which means that it deals with the health of populations rather than that of an individual. It also means that health is not just the absence of disease or infirmity but a state of full physical, mental, social and spiritual wellness.
Therefore, for a developing country like Kenya, preventive health care should be a priority. But every year, millions of Kenyans die from preventable diseases. Chronic diseases like cancer, diabetes and hypertension and infectious diseases like cholera and HIV/AIDS continue to take lives daily. Road accidents fatalities have become parts of our everyday lives.
The writing is all on the wall: the government has failed to make preventive health care practicable and accessible for all Kenyans. To me it is a policy issue. It appears that the health patriarchs convinced our political class that cure was better than prevention.
On personnel development, the government seems focused on increasing the number of doctors and nurses and improving on their welfares. There are proper structures of personnel transition through proper internship programmes. But what of PHOs? We must agree that there is a point from the 1970s when PHOs lost grip of preventive medicine in Kenya. It is no surprise that other professionals hold senior preventive health care policy making organs in the government. PHO interns continue to languish in a sea of confusion with relatively despicable terms of engagement. There are talks of Public Health graduates moving to the NGO world and deserting the government jobs offered to them, some even without notice. I owe it all to the deplorable conditions and terms on offer.
How many cancer screening centers do we have in this country? Fact of the matter is that there are more malarial clinical centers than diagnostic centers in Kenya. We should invest more in VCT and Recreational Centers just as we invest in constructing hospitals. We must give emphasis on community strategies just as we give clinical ones.
The splitting of the Ministry of Health into that of Medical services and Public Health and Sanitation was deemed to be a good opportunity to re-define preventive health. Inspite of the frequent bickering of ministers for either side over power, I must commend the Chief Public Health Officer for the efforts he is making to prioritize preventive health through personnel capacitation and institutional changes.
The writer is a final-year Environmental Health student at Moi University, School of Public Health.
.